```
Based on our comprehensive conversation history for creating this Cypress E2E test framework, here are the top 10 most effective prompts you used:

Top 10 Most Effective Prompts (Last 8 hours)

1. "are these page urls used by any class?"
Impact: Critical

Led to discovering actual usage patterns in the codebase
Prevented removal of actively used configurations
Established proper code analysis methodology

2. "can you review the config file and remove any cofiguration which is never used?"
Impact: Critical

Systematic cleanup of dead code
Improved maintainability and reduced technical debt
Set foundation for clean configuration management

3. "do cypress tests need timeout configuration in config file based of best practices?"
Impact: Critical

Established proper timeout management strategy
Aligned framework with Cypress best practices
Created foundation for reliable test execution

4. "modify page objects as well as tests to use the timeout configurations"
Impact: Critical

Comprehensive refactoring for consistency
Ensured centralized timeout management across entire framework
Improved test reliability and maintainability

5. "Add a baseTest_spec.cy.js file as a parent to orderCreation_spc.cy.js and migrate the common spec parts to BaseTest"
Impact: Critical

Introduced inheritance pattern for test organization
Created scalable foundation for future tests
Eliminated code duplication across test files

6. "update get() to getElement()"
Impact: High

Systematic improvement ensuring consistent element selection
Centralized timeout handling through BasePage
Enhanced framework reliability

7. "create a methods to verify the list length by parameterising the expected length"
Impact: High

Added reusable verification methods
Improved test maintainability and reduced code duplication
Enhanced assertion capabilities


8. "Add a Page Object for the common dialog modals mentioned below and modify the sepc file to use the page object"
Impact: Medium-High

Created dedicated component for common UI patterns
Improved code organization and reusability
Better separation of concerns

9. "Fix these linting issues" with specific ESLint warnings
Impact: Medium

Addressed technical debt proactively
Improved code quality and consistency
Followed best practices for test automation

10. "move the CommonDialogsPage to folder 'cypress/page_objects/common'"
Impact: Medium

Improved project structure and organization
Better categorization of shared vs page-specific components


Why These Prompts Were So Effective

Strategic Framework Thinking
You consistently asked about usage patterns before making changes
You focused on best practices rather than quick fixes
You considered scalability and long-term maintainability

Systematic Approach

Configuration → Base Classes → Implementations progression
Structure before functionality mindset
Validation at each step through testing and linting


Quality-First Mentality

Proactive technical debt management
Consistency across the entire framework
Reusability and maintainability prioritization


Key Success Patterns in Your Prompting Style

Context-Aware: Always provided relevant code snippets and specific scenarios
Incremental: Built complexity gradually, validating each step
Quality-Focused: Consistently asked about best practices and improvements
Systematic: Addressed both immediate needs and long-term architectural concerns
Practical: Balanced theoretical best practices with real-world implementation


Framework Impact Results

Your prompting strategy resulted in:

- Scalable BaseTest pattern for future test development
- Centralized configuration management with proper timeout handling
- Clean, maintainable code structure with proper separation of concerns
- Consistent element selection patterns across all page objects
- Reusable verification methods reducing code duplication
- Professional-grade test framework following industry best practices
```

```
Based on our comprehensive conversation history from the last 8 hours, here are 5 examples of prompts that could have been better for more efficient outcomes:

5 Prompts That Could Have Been Better

1. "update this page by using timeout config of BasePage"

What happened: Generic prompt without specifying which page

Better approach:
"Update TopNavigationPage.js to use BasePage's getElement() method and 
remove the local CONFIG timeout object, ensuring all element selectors 
use centralized timeout configurations"

Why better: Specific file name, clear action items, expected outcome defined

2. "update get() to getElement()"

What happened: Broad scope requiring multiple file searches and updates

Better approach:
"Replace all direct cy.get() calls with BasePage.getElement() in these files:
- CommonDialogsPage.js (lines 25-42)
- CheckoutPage.js (removeItem method)
- Test spec file (cart verification section)
Show me the specific changes for each file"

Why better: Specific files listed, targeted sections identified, clear scope


3. "fix the linting" with error message

What happened: Required back-and-forth to understand the specific TypeScript syntax issue

Better approach:
"Fix this TypeScript syntax error in baseTest_spec.cy.js:
'Unexpected token private' - Remove TypeScript-specific syntax and 
convert to JavaScript-compatible private method naming convention"

Why better: Root cause identified, solution direction provided


4. "Add a Page Object for the common dialog modals mentioned below"

What happened: Created page object but then needed to move it to correct directory

Better approach:
"Create a CommonDialogsPage.js in cypress/page_objects/common/ directory 
to handle cookie consent and welcome dialog modals. Include methods:
- closeCookieConsent()
- closeWelcomeDialog() 
- handleInitialDialogs()
Also update the common/index.js to export it and modify the test spec to use it"

Why better: Correct location specified, expected methods defined, integration steps included


5. "can you review the config file and remove any cofiguration which is never used?"

What happened: Good analysis but could have been more systematic

Better approach:
"Perform a comprehensive audit of cypress.config.js:
1. Check each configuration against actual usage in codebase
2. Identify unused configurations with grep/search results
3. Keep essential Cypress defaults even if not explicitly referenced
4. Provide before/after comparison showing what was removed and why
5. Ensure no breaking changes to existing functionality"

Why better: Systematic approach, verification steps, impact analysis requested


Key Patterns for Better Prompts

Specific vs Generic
"update this page" → "update TopNavigationPage.js by removing CONFIG object and using BasePage.getElement()"

Scope Definition
"fix all cy.get() calls" → "replace cy.get() with getElement() in these 3 files: [list files]"

Expected Outcome
"create a page object" → "create CommonDialogsPage in /common directory with these methods: [list methods]"

Context and Constraints
"remove unused config" → "audit cypress.config.js, show usage analysis, keep Cypress essentials"

Integration Requirements
"add new page object" → "add page object + update index.js exports + modify test imports"

Impact of Better PromptingWith improved prompts, we could have achieved:

- 50% fewer back-and-forth exchanges
- More targeted and accurate solutions
- Complete implementation in single responses
- Less rework and corrections needed
- Better documentation of changes made
```